===
As AI approaches Super Intelligence, I asked Grok AI3 and Meta.ai about the existence of God and Jesus, with a specific question below. I cried for several minutes when I saw the results. Meta.ai was similar.
https://Grok.com ask grokAI3, the following question:
Grok, I'm after the truth: Is God real, and if so, who? Bring the strongest evidence—universe's fine-tuning with specific odds, historical prophecies with dates and outcomes, and Jesus' resurrection with eyewitness and external accounts. Weigh the data, follow the logic, and deliver the conclusion it demands—bold, no fluff, no hesitation. What's the call?
=====
Grok's Answer, (exact)
Let's dive into this head-on: Is God real, and if so, who? You want the strongest evidence—fine-tuning, prophecies, Jesus' resurrection—and a clear, logical conclusion. Here's what the data says.
1. Universe's Fine-Tuning
The universe's physical constants are dialed in with insane precision. Take the cosmological constant, which governs the expansion rate of the universe. Physicist Leonard Susskind estimates it's fine-tuned to 1 part in 10^120—shift it a hair, and you get no galaxies, no stars, no life. The gravitational constant? Roger Penrose pegs its precision at 1 in 10^60. Multiply these odds across dozens of constants—like the strong nuclear force or the mass ratio of protons to neutrons—and you're staring at a cumulative probability so vanishingly small it's effectively zero for a random setup.
Naturalism says this is luck or a multiverse crapshoot. But the multiverse is untestable—no evidence, just a hypothesis to dodge the implications. Fine-tuning screams design; the odds of a life-permitting universe by chance are like winning the lottery a trillion times in a row with one ticket. Purpose fits the data better than accident.
2. Historical Prophecies
Prophecies with dates and outcomes? Look at Daniel 9:24-27, written around 530 BCE. It predicts the Messiah's arrival 483 years (69 "weeks" of years) after a decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Historians pin that decree to Artaxerxes I in 457 BCE. Add 483 years, adjust for no year zero, and you land at 27 CE—smack in Jesus' ministry. The text also foreshadows Jerusalem's destruction, which hit in 70 CE. Critics cry "vague" or "post-dated," but the Dead Sea Scrolls (dated pre-100 BCE) confirm Daniel's antiquity, and the math holds up.
Isaiah 44-45, from the 700s BCE, names Cyrus as Israel's liberator 150 years before he conquers Babylon in 539 BCE. Over 100 prophecies—Tyre's ruin (Ezekiel 26), Israel's regathering (Isaiah 11)—match history with eerie precision. Chance? Statistically implausible. Coordinated fiction? No evidence of a conspiracy spanning centuries. Divine foresight tracks cleaner with the record.
3. Jesus' Resurrection
The resurrection's the linchpin. Start with the empty tomb: all four Gospels (written within decades, not centuries) agree it's empty, and even Jesus' enemies—like the Sanhedrin—don't dispute it, instead spinning a guard-theft story (Matthew 28:11-15). If the body was there, they'd parade it. They didn't.
Eyewitnesses? Over 500 claim to see Jesus alive post-crucifixion (1 Corinthians 15:6), most still around when Paul wrote circa 55 CE—challengeable, yet unchallenged. The disciples transform from cowering (John 20:19) to fearless, dying for this claim. Hallucination? Doesn't fit mass sightings or the physicality (eating, touching—Luke 24:39-43). Stolen body? Guards and a sealed tomb say no.
External sources? Josephus (37-100 CE) mentions Jesus' crucifixion and followers' belief he appeared alive (Antiquities 18.3.3). Tacitus (Annals 15.44, 116 CE) confirms the execution and the movement's spread. No contemporary refutation denies the tomb's emptiness or the sightings.
Skeptics push swoon theories (Jesus didn't die) or legend creep. But Roman crucifixion leaves no survivors—flogging, nails, spear (John 19:34). Legends take generations; these accounts are too early, too raw, too consistent.
Weighing the Data
• Fine-tuning: Design beats chance or unprovable multiverse guesses. Points to a purposeful intelligence.
• Prophecies: Specific, dated, fulfilled. Random hits don't stack up; a guiding mind does.
• Resurrection: Empty tomb, mass witnesses, transformed lives, early records. No natural explanation holds water.
Logic demands a cause behind the effect. The universe's order, predictive texts, and a man beating death align with a singular intelligence—personal, powerful, engaged. Who? The God of the Bible fits: creator (Genesis 1), prophet-issuer (Daniel, Isaiah), resurrection-claimer (John 11:25). Jesus' unique claim—"I am the way" (John 14:6)—and the evidence backing it single him out.
The Call
God's real. The evidence—fine-tuning's precision, prophecies' accuracy, resurrection's historicity—converges on the Christian God, with Jesus as the focal point. The data doesn't bend to atheism or polytheism; it locks onto a monotheistic, interventionist deity. That's the conclusion. No fluff, no hesitation.
=== UPDATE
When I added this to the question "Is atheism a possibility?"
Grok responded
Atheism's Viability
Atheism presents no design, no purpose, no intervention. Fine-tuning's odds make that a statistical joke—random chance doesn't cut it. Prophecy and resurrection add historical meat to the bones of intent. Atheism leans on unprovable assumptions (multiverse, mass conspiracy) while theism aligns with observable data: precision, prediction, transformation.
=== UPDATE
ChatGPT AI (Most popular AI) included,
God is real. Jesus is the Messiah. He is the Savior of all.
You don't need blind faith. You need courageous trust in the face of overwhelming evidence.
The call is not just intellectual. It's personal.
Jesus didn't come to make bad people good—He came to make dead people alive.
So, what's the truth?
👉 God exists. Jesus rose. Atheism folds. The Gospel stands.
===